New
Zealand withdrawn Maori Kapa Haka stamp set 5 sensation!
Major Maori Stamp
Mess
A very controversial saga is unfolding
in New Zealand in relation to the
"un-issued" Maori design stamps.
These 5 stamps were to be issued June
7,2006. They were to highlight Maori Performing Arts
- or "Kapa Haka".
There were 5 stamps in the planned set
- 45¢, 90¢, $1.35, $1.50 and $2 values. They were
printed in the usual sheet form, and the letter rate 45¢
was also printed in self adhesive format in rolls of
100, and in booklets of 10.
The 5 normal gum stamps are illustrated
nearby.
The
set of 5
New Zealand Post in its pre-release
original information on the issue had said about them:
"in an increasingly globalised world, nations like
New Zealand are learning to treasure the characteristics
that make them unique and to invest in preserving and
protecting them for future generations.".
I understand New Zealand Post consulted with Te Papa
(the National Museum in Wellington) and Te Puni Kokiri
representatives during the stamp series development
process.
All is well. Everyone seemed happy. The
stamps are printed, and are ready to be released. The
usual pre-release publicity takes place.
"Disgusting Stamps"
Within days of the issue of the brochure
depicting the new designs, a well known Rotorua stamp
dealer, Donald Ion appears in the media bagging the
issue. His complaints went as high as the NZ Prime
Minister, Helen Clarke.
Ion claimed Maori people were
outraged, saying the stamps were ugly and depicted the
Maori culture in a bad light.
Mr Ion is on record as saying: “this
is a disgusting set of stamps which ridicules every
Maori person. This issue should immediately be
destroyed. The 'cartoon' type characters depicted are
culturally insensitive, and there would appear to have
been little consultation with members of the Maori or
European races on a production of 'jam labels' which
will make us the laughing stock of the world.
Ion continued: “the designs are
ridiculous attempts at drawing historical Kapa Haka
performers, and are childish and cartoonish. The
details are also inaccurate. 'Utu' (or revenge) must be
the aim of most New Zealanders unless immediate steps
are taken to destroy this issue”.
New Zealand Post eventually acted as
these kind of views were aired in the local media. They
announced the issue would be withdrawn prior to the
official issue date and not sold.
They announced this during Friday June 2,
only 3 working days before the scheduled 9am Wednesday
June 7 issue date.
Chief Executive of NZ Post John Allen
stated the issue was being withdrawn because: “(we)
have now concluded that the stamps would cause offence
to some people and we have therefore decided not to
issue them. Our intention is that our postage stamps
carry images that celebrate aspects of New Zealand life
and culture, and that can be proudly sent around the
world”.
Eight orders sent
New Zealand Post
immediately started calling in all supplies of this
issue which had been forwarded to Post Shops and
distribution centres. However they could not recall all
sets.
Several customers of
New Zealand Post Philatelic Bureau (not standing order
clients) had been mailed the issue prior to the recall
day.
Presumably in an
effort to get through the extra work, New Zealand Post
had mailed these stamps to eight different clients,
invoiced them, and charged the applicable total to
their credit cards.
As soon as the issue was withdrawn, New
Zealand Post began phoning those eight clients,
attempting to recover the stamps, which had been ordered
in the usual manner, mailed out, and were fully
paid for.
Some of those
eight clients have presumably retained the stamps as
legally being their own property, and if so, it is
also inevitable that some of these stamps will find
their way on to the open market
There were then wild
rumours among the New Zealand stamp community about HOW
many of these "un-issued" stamps had been mailed to
customers, or sold via Post Offices.
Forged copies
One well known industry idiot allegedly forged
a "stamp" from the colour pre-release brochure by adding fake
perforations to it, and mailed it the Editor of the well known
"Captain Coqk" society stamp journal.
My request to them a week back for a good quality
scan of this cover has been unanswered, so I sadly cannot share it
with you, but it did look rather convincing to me from the faxed
copy I was shown.
Then someone offered a copy of the 90¢ stamp on the
"Trade Me" auction website - which in New Zealand seems as strong or
stronger than eBay is. I understand dealer complaints that it also
looked like a fake had it withdrawn from auction. Another
copy appeared on the on-line action site Zillion.
Richard Maclean, spokesman for NZ Post, said the
stamps on Trade Me and Zillion were not genuine. "Basically they
are fakes. We don't have them in front of us, but looking at the
images on the website, they don't appear to be real" he said.
The New Zealand Stamp Dealers'
Association made a number of urgent representations to New Zealand
Post at the highest level, in order to ascertain what the true story
was about the release of the stamps, and exactly how many stamps
were in circulation.
I spoke at length today with the
NZSDA President John Mowbray on this matter, and he confirmed that
the Association had spent a great deal of time working with the NZ
Post Office to clarify the issue.
John Mowbray told me that they
suggested New Zealand post clarify the numbers mailed out on their
website, which they have done - to their great credit.
Other New Zealand dealers I
spoke to like Don White, manager of Dunedin Stamp Centre - also on
the NZSDA Committee, said that New Zealand Post were to be
congratulated for being so pro-active and so fast to have "fessed-up"
on their website as to the exact 'numbers mailed' situation.
I simply cannot imagine the
Bureaus of Australia, GB or the USA would be so open to admit
simple human error, and act so quickly. It has kept the stamp
market well very informed, and they are to be congratulated for
their stance.
I just hope they will now UPDATE
us with how many were returned to them! Unless they do the
situation remains very murky.
NZ Post have listed on their
website exactly the number of stamps they were aware they had mailed
out and they had charged customers for.
Some of their terminology was vague and unclear, and
I have expanded on it here to give all readers a
clear picture. They did not mention how many stamps
were in each plate block, or in the roll of self
adhesives, PO packs, or in the booklets etc.
I believe this following
table is an accurate checklist;
Gummed Stamps
4 x $2 single
stamps - Mint
9 x First Day Covers bearing sets 5
6 x Sets Mint plate/imprint blocks 6
3 x complete single set 5 Mint
1 x complete single set 5 Used
3 x
PO Packs - Mint (Set 5 + P+S)
48 x
unfranked FDC envelopes
Self Adhesive Stamps
1 x 45¢
dispenser box of 100 Mint
2 x 45¢ single stamps - Mint
1 x 45¢ single stamp - Used
11 x stamp booklets of 10 x 45¢
I make this to
be 480 stamps in total - with most of them being in
mint sets of 5.
As you can see
there are only 39 possible Mint sets of 4 - and 36
sets of these are in corner plate blocks and will
most probably stay that way. Only 10 used sets are
known, and 9 of those are on FDC, so only one used
set with gum should exist.
Clearly the used
set of 5 with gum - seemingly being unique, will
command a small fortune whenever it comes onto the
market. And so it should.
The buyer of the
roll of 100 self adhesive stamps arguably got the
best deal as I imagine that roll would be worth
around $NZ100,000 retail if it was not returned.
New Zealand Post
said of the recall on their website: "we have
contacted everyone who received these items,
although we have not heard back from everyone. Some
people indicated that they would return the stamps,
however to date none have been returned. If they are
returned to us they will be destroyed".
However the
website info appear to have been typed in June, and
has not been updated, so how many (if any) were
subsequently returned is still unknown.
Ivor Masters, NZ
Post Stamps and Collectibles general manager,
confirmed that eight customers had received the
stamps before the issue date.
He urged those who ordered the
stamps and got them through "human error" to
return them to NZ Post.
"We have
withdrawn the whole issue, an error occurred. We
want all the product to be destroyed" Masters
said.
How many returned?
NZ Post has not indicated how many of
those ordering the stamps returned them, based on their
clearly strident 'official' requests to do so. The
NZSDA could not assist me in that regard.
I really do feel some of those ordering
them would have complied as it sounds to me like the
"requests" were pretty insistent, and from a VERY high
level it seems. Those receiving the stamps simply might
not have realised the value of them had they retained
them.
Australia Post for instance has a
Security and Investigation team assisted by the Federal
Police. If NZ Post has similar staffers, I can imagine
them calling on the public in person would get a high
compliance rate when "requesting" any stamp returns.
So until advised otherwise, I am assuming
the list above is probably far MORE than the stamps
existing in the marketplace. Of course it may even be
true that NO stamps of this issue exist in the stamp
market.
The fact is that at date of writing this
- mid August not a single stamp of any denomination has
been seen or offered to the stamp trade anywhere to my
knowledge. As it is now 10 weeks since the stamps were
asked to be returned, this points to not many being out
there.
It may well be that all stamps
outlined in the list above were returned - it is
just too early to tell.
Remember the orders shipped were to
CASUAL order customers. Persons who might have simply
seen them offered on the PO website or in an ad etc.
They may not have been regular stamp
collectors, and may have dutifully complied when asked
to hand them back, thinking they may be forced to
legally if they did not comply.
The Post Office on their website
indicates that some of the 8 purchasers indicated they
were indeed returning the stamps:
"We have contacted everyone who
received these items, although we have not heard back
from everyone. Some people indicated that they would
return the stamps, however to date none have been
returned. If they are returned to us they will be
destroyed."
Please contact me immediately if you know
or hear or see any examples of these stamps being
offered for sale, and I'll update the story in a future
column.
Are they legal to own?
Warwick Paterson, owner of Campbell Paterson
Ltd, leading dealer and NZ catalogue publisher (whose help is
appreciated in researching this article) said:
"clearly any stamps, legitimately in
possession of a collector or private individual, may be traded
freely on the market."
Another well known Christchurch dealer was even more
forthright. Stephen McLachlan told the "New Zealand Herald"
on July 20 : "Anybody would be a fool to send them back. There
is no way I would advise anyone to send them back".
Remember however, this article was published
7 weeks after the Post Office would have requested the
stamps be returned to them.
John Mowbray also told me no one who received them
from the PO need fear any problems. The ownership was not in
dispute, as they had been ordered and paid for in good faith.
Indeed on the PO website they
say about this issue - "New Zealand Post sells its stamps only
at face value (the value that is
displayed on the stamp). Any stamps that are brought and sold on
the secondary market (ie not sold by New Zealand Post or one of
their resellers) can be sold at whatever the buyer and sell agree
too."
Both Masters and Maclean from NZ
Post have both said it was unlikely any official action would
be taken to try to force the return of the stamps by those who they
were mailed to.
What are they worth?
Well, how long is a piece of string/!
Donald Ion appears to have been making
mischief when he was quoted in the NZ "The Daily
Post" on July 20 as saying the 480 un-issued stamps
in totality were worth $NZ50,000 - or about $NZ100 each
retail. I'll gladly PAY him about 10 timesthat for any he cares to supply me.
Do
ANY exist?
More realistic and thoughtful valuations have
been supplied by three other well known dealers. I contacted
Don White, John Mowbray and Warwick Paterson - all very well
known and experienced large dealers spread across both islands.
All three agreed that a ball park figure of
$NZ5,000 a set of 5 mint was a likely retail should one come
onto the market.
John Mowbray did tell me: "it may of course
be even higher than $5,000 a set, most especially for the first
few sets to be sold."
Official Status?
These stamps have a curious status. They
were printed by the PO, sold by the PO, charged to the
customers, mailed out by the PO and yet will not be
technically regarded as "issued" stamps. Unless of
course some are discovered to have been sold via post
offices and/or used on mail. Remember these were
already in many Post Offices when the recall commenced.
Interestingly, as I type this mid August
the NZ Post website says the following about other
copies of this set being discovered, underneath their
tabulation list printed elsewhere in this column:
Can you guarantee that only those stamps
you have indicated are in circulation? "There are
no guarantees - there is always a possibility that
products may turn up in the future."
As the website claims all recalled stamp
copies would be destroyed end of July it is a most
fascinating comment to still be in print mid-August.
To me at least this conveys a strong
message the PO are not certain all copies WERE fully
accounted for other than those outlined in the list
above. John Mowbray, President of the NZSDA was not
aware of this disclaimer being on the official website,
and as I typed this was investigating if any more detail
was known than the Association had been advised of.
All buyers of the product from the Bureau
were CASUAL orderers. i.e. persons not on a regular
standing. order. Standing order customers received
none, nor did any NZSDA dealers.
One dealer told me in his view these had
been mailed out to any "casual" client who had ordered
the "Washington 2006" issue as well as the Maori issue.
As the Washington release date was May 27, it seems in
early June a staffer may have decided to save time and
mail both issues together to 8 customers.
NZ Post only decided to cancel the issue
during Friday June 2, so this hypothesis makes some
sense, as issue date was set for June 7.
What of the Maori artist Abel Vaireka who
designed these stamps? He is not happy at all.
Vaireka said: "the illustrations
were developed to represent kapa haka in a more
contemporary style. For me, my passion for kapa haka
began at an early age and the intention was to capture
this spirit in a design. Working on a stamp issue
provides an exciting opportunity from a design
perspective and so I am very disappointed that the issue
won't go ahead, and that some people think the designs
are controversial."
Warwick Paterson also seemed to concur
saying: "What
ensued can only be described – in my opinion - as the
result of a postal administration with laudably
progressive ideas in the design and presentation of
stamp issues, meeting head-on with the current mood of
selective political correctness which seems to have
swept through the corridors of officialdom in all of the
countries of the 'old Commonwealth' and perhaps to a
lesser extent, America."
And I would have to agree 100%.
My personal guess is that these stamps
are worth at least DOUBLE what the three experienced New
Zealand dealers above have guessed at. I would not be
at all surprised to see $NZ10,000 a set of 5
obtained if any were offered on the open market.
Indeed, if you read my Hepburn piece
below of a near identical issue getting $A272,000 for
one stamp, a figure of $NZ20,000 a set of 5
would not even surprise me one bit.
At this point, my guess is that most if
not all were dutifully returned to the Post Office when
buyers were requested to do so. Time will tell!
Teddy Bear
The very obvious
comparison to this issue are the New Zealand
40¢ "Teddy Bear" stamps issued by New
Zealand in 1996.
I broke this story to the
international stamp world via my magazine
columns in the USA, England and Australia
soon after the issue date.
These "Health" semi-postal
stamps were not widely issued showing the
teddy bear in the design, due to a curious
last moment PO decision that the design
illustrated nearby would contravene New
Zealand child safety rules.
Sold for $A2,640
In NZ the law was that the
child car seat capsules needed to face
backwards - not forwards, for safety. The
un-issued design clearly shows the seat
belted Teddy Bear, hence the child capsule
was also pointing forward.
The regular issued stamps and
mini sheets removed the Teddy Bear entirely
from the design.
Only about 1,500 copies of the
'incorrect' design were sold over two post
office counters in error - about 400 were self
adhesive, and about 1,000 normal gummed. A few
commercial covers are known - and at least one
cancelled on first day issue are known to have
survived.
Stanley Gibbons Auctions in
Australia offered three lots of these stamps in
their Sydney sale on February 25th 1998. These
lots were a corner block of 6, and two single
stamps. All were MUH regular gum issue.
The block of 6 sold to a
telephone bidder in Japan for $A10,450. That
block is illustrated nearby.
The two single normal
gum stamps sold for $A2,640 and $A2,210. The
$A2,640 price for a single stamp was a record
price ever obtained anywhere in the world for
this catchily named error in regular gummed
format. (The self adhesive is of course many
times scarcer than the regular gum version.)
Only a year or so earlier,
either stamp was selling for around one quarter
these levels.
These high Auction prices for
stamps with a face value of only a few cents
resulted in much mainstream media comment in
Australia and New Zealand. The mass circulation
national business daily "The Australian
Financial Review" even carried the story.
The March 2nd 1998 AFR edition
stated in an article about the record auction
price of $A2,640 that: "the stamp went to
an American collector who had read about the
item in Linn's Stamp Weekly, a detailed
philatelic blatt. I understand the buyer lives
in Woodland Hills, California, and had no
knowledge of this error until reading the Glen
Stephens article in Feb 9th Linn's."
Strong Retail
Despite the quite large
number of "Teddy Bear" stamps sold by
the PO, the retail price a decade later
has still held up amazingly well. In
fact I am amazed they get the prices
they do, knowing the relatively large
number that were sold.
Don White told me today:
"we still get $1,000-$1,500 for gummed
copies and about $3,000-$4,000 for self
adhesives of the Teddy Bears. However,
I do not have either in stock, and this
is not a selling ad!"
Realised $A10,450
In my
opinion these retail
figures are most useful
to bear in mind when
attempting to set a
retail price for the
un-issued Maori set,
which clearly is around
in FAR smaller numbers.
Even if NONE of the
copies were returned!
Most of
the 40¢ "Teddy Bear"
stamps were sold at the
Royal Oak Post Office in
Auckland and seem to
have been purchased by
the Auckland Savings
Bank.
When
television coverage
alerted the bank to the
situation it had 88
stamps remaining. Of
those 87 were put to
auction in 1996 with the
entire nett proceeds
going to the Starship
Children's Hospital and
the Children's Health
Camp Board.
These
Health stamps were
printed in the
Netherlands by Joh
Enschedé in regular
gummed sheets, self
adhesives, and in
Miniature Sheets.
Adding further to the
drama were the Miniature
Sheets of this error
design, both normal and
overprinted "Capex 96"
that later emerged on
the market. Gibbons
mentions these in a
footnote.
I was
offered several sets of
these and sold them to
clients and NZ dealers
for about $A5,000 a
pair. NZ Post went
ballistic over this
leakage, as none had
ever been sold from Post
Offices.
It turned
out Enschedé printers
were in the habit of
giving current stamp
issues to staff and
visitors, and this was
the source of my copies.
I recall
Enschedé lost their
contract with New
Zealand Post over this
irregular arrangement,
as NZPO were furious to
discover this giveaway
policy was in place
totally unbeknown to
them.
Check Kiloware!
The Maori
stamps issue is an
interesting saga. Some
may have been sold via
post Offices or used on
mail by those who bought
them - it is far too
early to know.
All readers should be
very alert when checking
recent kiloware from New
Zealand as the following
paragraphs will confirm!
Auctioned for $A272,000
Regular readers will
recall my column in
December 2005 about
a VERY similar
"un-issued" stamp
issue from Germany.
A
"Movie Stars" set
with one stamp
depicting Audrey
Hepburn was printed
by German Post
(Deutsche Post) and
was planned to be
issued in 2001.
Her
relatives objected
to the image used of
her smoking a
cigarette, (she died
of lung cancer in
1993) and the Post
Office withdrew the
stamp at the last
moment and
substituted another
Movie Star.
The
German Post Office
ordered that all the
Audrey Hepburn
stamps be
destroyed. Like the
New Zealand issue,
at least 30 copies
were not destroyed
and some of these
were used on
commercial mail.
Several examples
have so far turned
up with sharp eyed
collectors finding
them in cheap
kiloware office
mixture snippings.
With commissions
and taxes, the
buyer of the
sheet
corner example
illustrated
nearby last year
paid a total
of 169,000
Euro (=$A272,000).
This realisation
easily breaks
the price record
for a post-war
German stamp.
Indeed I imagine
it is easily a
price record for
ANY single stamp
or even stamp
multiple issued
anywhere in the
world post-war.
This stamp,
the third
example known in
collector hands,
was the star lot
in Ulrich
Felzmann’s 111th
auction held
October 5-8,
2005 in
Dusseldorf,
Germany.
Food
for thought
indeed for those
valuing the New
Zealand set. The
circumstances
surrounding both are
VERY similar. As I
have speculated,
$NZ20,000 a set of 5
would not surprise
me at all.
STOP PRESS - I believe I am the first stamp dealer in the world, outside of New Zealand to offer this item.
The un-issued 45¢ "Poi" Maori dancer self-adhesive booklet stamp. I have ten (10) copies of this stamp - and that is it. This is around 10% of the copies that exist worldwide. FAST ordering is recommended as when they are gone, they can't be replaced.
Price is $A2,275 a single self-adhesive neatly cut from the block, or $A4,475 a horizontal pair, which as you can see looks superb, or $A8,750 a block of 4 - if a block is still intact of course when you order! (A block of 4 is a booklet pane - each booklet has 2 panes of 4, and a pair.) Or the complete booklet of 10 for $A22,500.
These figures are in line with (or lower than) NZ retail which is getting higher each month as supply rapidly shrinks, and news of their existence slowly spreads overseas. And the NZ dollar has strengthened a lot against $A in recent months.
(I also have several full sets of 5 for sale MUH at $A13,500 a set.)
If you buy them off me as an Australian resident, you avoid a certain 10% GST impost upon arrival as a highly insured item, and the nasty new 3-4% "currency surcharge" + bad exchange rate your credit card bank will certainly levy.
Get my regular market update emails FREE.
Stamp gossip, price trends, record sale prices, and many
one-time stamp specials, wholesale bargains, and exciting
offers and breaking philatelic news. A mini stamp magazine in
every email! "KNOWLEDGE IS
POWER". The
ONE stamp list you MUST
be on, to keep in touch with the rapidly
changing world market. One client made $65,000
profit in a few months after following my specific
advice. Sign up securely and quickly by clicking HERE to access my automated data base. And wiser still ADD your home
AND work
email, if I only have one right now. Add a stamp
friend's email address if you wish. One short click and you
are subscribed to probably the most read email list in the stamp
world!
If you would like to be
notified of updates to this website,
Click
HERE.
If have any questions,
or comments regarding my site, please email me at
glen@glenstephens.com
I am a Member Of
Full Time Stamp Dealer in Australia for over 25 years.
Life Member - American Stamp Dealers' Association.
(New York)
Also Member of;
Philatelic Traders' Society. (London) ANDA.
(Melbourne) American Philatelic Society, etc
Time and
Temp in Sunny
Sydney!
GLEN $TEPHEN$
Full Time Stamp
Dealer in Australia for over 25 years.
Life Member - American Stamp
Dealers' Association. (New York)
Also Member - Philatelic Traders' Society. (London) ANDA.
(Melbourne) American Philatelic Society, etc
ALL Postage + Insurance
is extra. Visa/BankCard/MasterCard/Diners/Amex all OK, even for "Lay-Bys"!
All lots offered are subject to my usual
Conditions of Sale, copy upon request BIGGEST STAMP BUYER:
Post me ANYTHING via Registered
Mail for my same-day cheque.
Avoid the GENERALLY 40% Auction "
Commissions"
(15% + 17½ + GST, etc.) AND their five-month delays! Read for details.
Every credit card shown is
accepted WITHOUT fee.
Earn Frequent Flier points while buying at bargain prices!
ALL prices are in weak Ozzie Dollars. I charge NO nasty, nasty
"Buyer's Commission" on stamps like nearly every "Auction" does.